Walk into a monitor aisle or scroll through a shop listing and you will see 144Hz and 165Hz sitting side by side at nearly the same price. Is 165Hz better than 144Hz, or is it a number added for marketing? The gap is only 21 refreshes per second, which sounds like nothing, and that is why the answer needs some care.
- 165Hz is technically better than 144Hz, but the visible gain is small.
- The frame time difference is only 0.88 milliseconds, hard to notice in normal play.
- Panel quality, response time and resolution matter more than this 21Hz gap.
- Choose 165Hz if the price is equal, but do not pay a big premium for it.
Where the 165Hz Number Came From
The odd refresh rate has a practical origin. Panel makers found that many 144Hz-rated panels could be overclocked slightly without failing, so 165Hz became a marketing tier.
- Manufacturers first pushed 144Hz panels to 165Hz through firmware and timing changes.
- Later panels were built and binned specifically for 165Hz, often IPS or VA models at 1440p.
- The number stuck, and 165Hz now shows up at almost every price point in the mid-range.
The general idea of pushing a display beyond its baseline rate is called overclocking. Wikipedia’s refresh rate entry explains the concept of refresh rates in more detail.
The Numbers, Side by Side
Here is what the difference actually looks like in hard terms. The gap is real, but small.
| Metric | 144Hz | 165Hz |
|---|---|---|
| Time per frame | 6.94 ms | 6.06 ms |
| Frames per second shown | 144 | 165 |
| Gain vs 144Hz | Baseline | About 14.6 percent more refreshes |
| Time saved per frame | None | 0.88 ms |
Compare that with the jump from 60Hz to 144Hz, which saves about 9.7 milliseconds per frame. The 144 to 165 step is roughly one-eleventh of that gain.
Can You Actually Feel the Difference?
For most players, no. Side-by-side tests with sharp eyes and a fast game can show a difference, but it is subtle and only when your frame rate matches the refresh rate.
- You need to hold 165fps to benefit, which is harder than holding 144fps in demanding games.
- A steady 144fps often feels smoother than an inconsistent 165fps that dips.
- Competitive players who track tiny movements might notice slightly better fluidity, while casual gamers usually do not.
I would not call it a life-changing upgrade. If you already own a 144Hz screen, spending money to move to 165Hz is not worth it.
Bandwidth and Cable Limits
There is one place the two rates diverge in practice: the cable. The extra refresh rate needs more data, and this affects older HDMI connections in particular.
- At 1080p, both 144Hz and 165Hz are supported by HDMI 2.0 and DisplayPort.
- At 1440p, 144Hz sits comfortably within HDMI 2.0, while 165Hz is at or beyond its limit on some monitors, so DisplayPort is the safer route.
- Some monitors offer 165Hz only through DisplayPort, and list a lower maximum over HDMI.
It is worth reading the monitor spec sheet closely, and our guide on gaming monitor HDMI ports explains what to look for.
Panel Quality Matters More Than 21Hz
When you choose between two monitors, other traits change your experience far more than 144 versus 165. Consider these before the refresh rate.
- Response time: a slow panel smears moving objects regardless of Hz. Look at independent reviews, not just the manufacturer’s 1ms claim.
- Panel type: IPS gives better colors and viewing angles, VA gives better contrast, and each behaves differently at high refresh.
- Resolution: 1440p is a bigger upgrade over 1080p than 165Hz over 144Hz.
- VRR support: G-SYNC Compatible or FreeSync makes lower frame rates look smoother.
A good 144Hz IPS monitor can beat a mediocre 165Hz one in daily use. The RTINGS refresh rate testing notes explain how they measure motion performance, which is the number that matters.
Does Your PC Need to Be Stronger for 165Hz?
Slightly, yes. To fill 165Hz you need 21 more frames per second than for 144Hz, and that is about 15 percent more performance.
- In eSports titles, a modern mid-range card handles it easily at 1080p.
- In AAA games at 1440p, most PCs run below 144fps anyway, so the extra 21Hz goes unused.
- With VRR, the difference disappears at lower frame rates, since the monitor follows your frame rate.
Refresh rate and hardware should match your usage, as the piece on how many Hz a gaming monitor should have lays out.
Price: When 165Hz Is Worth Choosing
Since both tiers often sit in the same price band, the decision usually comes down to what else is in the box. If the 165Hz model is cheaper or the same price, take it. If it costs noticeably more, buy the 144Hz one and put the savings toward a better panel.
Quick Warning: some listings advertise 165Hz as a peak over DisplayPort only. Check that the port you plan to use actually supports it, or you may end up running at 144Hz anyway.
Check the details in the retailer spec sheet, and see our overview of how much a gaming monitor costs for realistic budget ranges.
Who Should Pick Which
To make this practical, here is how I would split the decision by type of player. It is opinion drawn from how people actually use these screens.
- Pick 144Hz if: you play a mix of games, already own a 144Hz panel, or found a model with better color and response for the same price.
- Pick 165Hz if: the price is equal, you play competitive games at 1080p or 1440p, and your GPU can hold well above 144fps.
- Skip both if: your favorite games rarely pass 100fps, since a stronger GPU or a sharper panel matters more.
Getting 165Hz Working
Buying a 165Hz monitor does not always mean you are running at 165Hz. Windows often defaults to 60Hz, and the setting must be changed by hand.
- Connect with DisplayPort where possible.
- Right-click the desktop, open Display settings, then Advanced display, and choose 165Hz from the refresh rate list.
- Confirm the same value in the NVIDIA Control Panel under Change resolution.
Microsoft has a short walkthrough on its refresh rate support page, and this is the step most new owners skip.
The Verdict
So, is 165Hz better than 144Hz? On paper yes, in daily use barely. Treat it as a free bonus when the price matches, and never as the reason to pick one monitor over a better-built rival.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Is 165Hz noticeably better than 144Hz?
Not for most people. The difference in frame time is under 1 millisecond, and it only shows up when your PC produces 165fps consistently.
2. Should I pay extra for 165Hz?
No. If the price is nearly the same, 165Hz is a small bonus. If there is a big premium, spend it on a better panel instead.
3. Can HDMI run 165Hz?
Often at 1080p, yes. At 1440p it depends on the monitor and HDMI version, and many models restrict 165Hz to DisplayPort.
4. Does 165Hz need a stronger graphics card?
About 15 percent more performance to fully use it. With VRR on, you still benefit at lower frame rates.
This article reflects manufacturer-published information and general industry reporting, and monitor specifications vary by model, so confirm details on the product page before buying.
